Afterthoughts about Robert Galbraith's Career of Evil. Lots of spoilers, so putting the post after a jump.
Read MoreA Romance Novel Isn't Exactly "Infinite Jest"
So, hey, there's been another article published in a newspaper that casually assumes that all romance novels are formulaic dreck. I've stopped paying attention to these articles. I've had the argument so often that it bores me now.
But one of the quotable moments from this one got my attention (it's a donotlink link), to wit: "But a romance novel isn't exactly Infinite Jest."
If every writer sits down and thinks, "Well, I've got to write the next Infinite Jest or there's no point..." the only people who finish books will be delusional narcissists.
There are bad books. There are good books. There are great books. Which books fall into which category is a matter of debate, but we need bad books. Bad books are like extras in a movie. The scene feels empty and less alive without them. Bad books are starting points; they leave room for growth. The profusion of bad books lessens the shame of writing one, which makes it easier to sit down and write a second, hopefully better than the first. And then a third, better again, and so on, until you've written a good book.
A thriving book culture will populate every part of the landscape, from shoddy to polished and from low to high. You don't have to read bad books--whatever your idea of 'bad' is. You don't have to like them, praise them, offer them your grudging respect. But if you want to collect the cream, you'd better hope that someone out there wants to buy the milk.
A Supposedly Fun Thing I'll Never Do Again by David Foster Wallace
I have started Infinite Jest two or three times and never get past the first hundred pages. I feel horrible about this, because it's a cultural touchstone and I want to experience it. I also feel A-OK about it, because I've come to realize that forcing myself to read something is a waste of time. Reading through a mental block is like trying to drink from a glass with a lid on it.
So I decided I'd give Wallace a shot through his essays and picked this one up as an audiobook. Surprise surprise, I really liked it.
With caveats. Some major caveats. Listening to this book was a lot like opening a time capsule. Somehow, I'd completely forgotten how riveted I'd once been by post-modern literature--forgotten that I once cared about post-modernism and defended it passionately. These essays were written at a time when that seemed like an exciting intellectual activity. How things change, hmm?
Some of the blasts from the past are less benign. The way Wallace talks about gender and race, for example, really shocked me. The dialogue has shifted so much in such a short amount of time.
And the essays are snobbish, too. Sometimes apologetically, sometimes with a self-conscious flair.
But wait, wait, I liked this book so maybe I should get around to that. There are seven essays in the book and I really enjoyed four of them.
"Getting Away from Already Being Pretty Much Away from It All" describes a visit to the Illinois state fair. Wallace is from Illinois but also feels alienated from his home state, and the essay zeroes in on that odd juxtaposition. He wanders the fair, describing the exhibits and the carnival rides, feeling sick and celebratory, nostalgic and revolted.
"David Lynch Keeps His Head" is about David Lynch. I am not a big David Lynch fan so I'm not sure whether it's good or bad that this essay held my attention so well. It didn't make me want to go watch any David Lynch movies, not at all; but I understood the phenomenon better after listening, and I enjoyed it. (Lots of uncomfortable/repellant statements about women in this essay, though.)
"Tennis Player Michael Joyce's Professional Artistry as a Paradigm of Certain Stuff about Choice, Freedom, Discipline, Joy, Grotesquerie, and Human Completeness" ... and now that I've written out that title I'm reminded that I can't decide if I like the way Wallace mixes slacker drawl and showy erudition. I suppose the goal is a tonal shift in academic language rather than a ploy for mass appeal, or... maybe I'd be wrong, because he certainly achieved mass appeal.
Anyway, this was an excellent essay about a professional tennis player--Michael Joyce--who's at the bottom of the top of his field. I have no interest in tennis at all but this held me riveted; Wallace writes about the sacrifices that the players make, how pursuing excellence in one field leaves them stunted in others. He writes about what it's like to be one of the very best players in the world and finding out that it's still not good enough, that almost-the-best still means chasing invitations, playing yourself into the ground, scrabbling for funds.
It's really moving. Wallace was, apparently, a gifted tennis player who couldn't break into the big leagues & an author who did break through but must have related to Joyce's predicament: success after success but unable to relax or rest on his laurels.
So it's an essay by a creative about what it's like to live the dream, costs and benefits both.
"A Supposedly Fun Thing I'll Never Do Again" is about a Caribbean cruise. It's the most purely enjoyable essay of the bunch, or at least it was for me. He describes the cruise industry, he catalogues each day he spends on the ship, and in between writes about selling an experience: in this case relaxation and fun. It's an interesting balancing act, and Wallace captures that--giving cruisers the illusion of choice (limitless options!) and also removing the burden of choice (no responsibilities, everything taken care of without lifting a finger), taking care to define the pleasures of the cruise so they can be delivered, how the cruise's success ultimately leaves him querulous and discontent.
STATION ELEVEN by Emily St. John Mandel
A lot of post-apocalyptic novels are about stripping people down to their essence. Who are we without cars, phones, grocery stores... laws, prisons, consequences. What does it mean to be human, how do you stay human, when you're living like an animal--fighting for survival, one step ahead of hunger.
Most post-apocalyptics will tell you that we're still social, that friendships and trust matter more than ever, that some of us are still noble, that strength shines through in a way it couldn't without a backdrop of sheer desperation. But they'll also have you looking over your shoulder, dogged by the inescapable notion that we're one natural disaster away from being cavemen, that our sense of self is built on an artificial foundation.
STATION ELEVEN is the antidote to that attitude. It has the frame of a conventional post-apocalyptic novel--a motley assortment of companions brought together by necessity, living a hard-scrabble existence, who encounter a charismatic arch-nemesis--but it's about the drive to make art, to move beyond subsistence, to cultivate beauty.
The main characters of the post-apocalypse in STATION ELEVEN belong to the Traveling Symphony, a group of musicians and actors who travel in a circuit around the great lakes, performing for the small settlements they pass through. Their motto is "survival is insufficient" and they make their livelihood proving that to themselves and to their audiences.
As a sidenote: I tend to be wary of art about how important art is. The element of self-congratulation can get really tiresome, like watching an awards show. Congratulations to us! And to us again! STATION ELEVEN never crossed that line for me. Maybe because the characters are more pragmatic than pretentious? They scavenge in abandoned homes for costumes, perform whatever the audience wants to see. Something about STATION ELEVEN reminded me of ROSENCRANTZ AND GUILDENSTERN ARE DEAD by Tom Stoppard; the players create a sense of heightened reality or surreality, not a circle jerk.
The book alternates between chapters set in the pre-apocalypse, before the disease that wipes out most of humanity, and chapters set in the post-apocalypse. The alternating timelines evoke nostalgia instead of horror, wonder instead of pain. A sense of loss permeates the book, but also of hope. It's melancholy and beautiful.
Human beings make art. It's a defining characteristic of our species. Strip us down to nothing and art will still come back.
Anyway. I enjoyed the book. It's well-written, atmospheric, enjoyable. Worth a read.
Get It Together
Hello, fellow lovers of stationery. I guess we're all here to share tips and tools and maybe ogle some pretty stationery? That seems like a worthwhile endeavor.
I'm going to walk you all through my writing process, but in the spirit of being useful/putting a dent in your wallet, will mostly focus on the various THINGS I use to get stuff done.
Plotting
I do all my brainstorming, plotting, and general problem-solving longhand. I cracked open a few of the notebooks I've filled up with my scribbles and took a picture--that double-page half-sphere is pretty much the entire plot of THE SECRET HEART.
As you can see, I tend to break up the page with tables, drawings, nested lists, etc. So I tend to use graph paper or dot grid paper. Dot grid paper has... er, a grid of dots... instead of solid lines on it; the idea is to make the paper as blank as possible (so that your writing stands out, no interference) while also making it easy to write in straight lines, maintain an even border, etc.
I'm also a big fan of whitelines paper. This can be hard to obtain; I really like the Whitelines brand and Leuchtterm seems to be selling a whitelines notebook now. Whitelines puts white lines on a slightly greyed out background; same principle of a well-ruled sheet where the lines themselves fade into the background.
Here are some pictures, in case my explanations aren't clear.
If you're the kind of person who likes to DIY your journals, my favorite place for finding organizer inserts is My Life All In One Place.
If you're interested in the kind of notebooks that I buy, I'll get there. But my choice of notebooks is determined by my choice of pen. I mostly write with fountain pens and I especially like to write with pens that make a nice fat line so I can see the paper slowly fill up with pretty colors as I write.
If this sounds silly to you... well, it probably is. But I have a theory that it keeps the wandering magpie part of my brain focused on the task at hand and actually improves my productivity.
I'm a fan of anything that makes writing more of a pleasure, though. Fountain pens are beautiful and functional; I don't wear much jewelry, so fountain pens sort of fill that role for me. And I find they write better than disposable pens. Plus, they give me access to hundreds of amazing colors of ink.
Here is a sampling of my pens and inks:
Rather than turn this into a fountain pen tutorial, I'll just say that I usually recommend the LAMY Safari as a good starter pen (my green LAMY Safari is pictured above; I use it all the time) and, for people who want a step up or a piston filler (I mostly write with piston fillers), I like Pelikan and TWSBI.
So I write with fountain pens and, if I have the choice, I prefer fountain pens that are incompatible with flimsy paper. They'll soak through flimsy paper and make it wrinkle, or the paper will be so thin that anything you write on one side of the sheet shows clearly on the other, so you can't write front and back.
So that's my first requirement in a notebook: it has to be fountain-pen friendly. Usually, that means heavier paper & often treated so that ink won't feather (bleed little spider-webby lines everywhere).
Like a lot of stationery fanatics, my gateway notebook was a Moleskine. I used Moleskines for years and years. But Moleskine paper isn't great for fountain pens and I started to find the paper quality uneven.
So I branched out. I used different types of bound journals for a while. I tried the Quo Vadis Habana and the Rhodia Webbie, and they're both solid choices. Good quality paper, sturdy craftsmanship, portable.
But then I got a bee in my bonnet about notebooks that won't lie flat. I wanted to be able to open up the notebook, turn to the right page, stare off into space for a few minutes, and then look down and still see the notebook open to the right page. And I don't want to be contorting myself so that I can write around a really rigid spine, or leaving huge borders around the spine because the bend in the paper makes it impossible to write on.
I was really happy with the Exacompta sketchbook that I bought, but after I filled it up, I couldn't find another anywhere. More recently, I've gone through a few Leuchtterm1917 notebooks. The thin, flexible notebooks are pretty affordable, they lie flat, and they also have blank index pages at the front.
But these days, I mostly use 8 X 11 pads of paper, wirebound along the top by preference. Rhodia makes nice ones.
I get a lot of my paper products from Goulet Pens. Also all my inks and some pens.
Because I've taken to using pads of paper I can't fit in my purse, I've also started carrying around a Nock Hightower. I got mine when it was still a Kickstarter reward but there's a proper online shop now. I usually keep a little pocket-sized Field Notes notebook in there, a ball point pen, and then whatever fountain pen I happen to be using that day.
But if I just want to jot down a line or two, or I have a bit of dialogue floating around in my head, I use Evernote. I have a (digital, not literal) notebook for plot ideas and a few notes... mostly it's a jumble because at the end of the day, I'll sit down at my computer and add the fragments or make the tweaks.
Though I also use Evernote to catalogue my recipes and I find it really, really useful for that. For all-around planning, I use the Bullet Journal method. It works really well for me.
Looking over this section, I feel like I should mention that the real source of all this organizing is that I'm by nature pretty forgetful and can tend toward laziness. If I don't have a system, I will fall behind on... almost everything. Which is probably why "make it fun" is almost always a part of my system. I have to trick myself a bit.
Writing
Alas, the actual writing of my books involves way less fun, pretty, colorful jewelry-adjacent stuff.
I do all my writing in Scrivener...
My favorite thing about Scrivener is the Snapshots feature. I'm not going to explain it any better than the official tutorial--the company puts out really great tutorials--so if you're interested, check it out:
Word Count/Accountability
I found about the "calendar trick" from Vanessa Schwab--here's a link to the blog post she wrote about it. The basic idea is that you settle on a good day's word count--whatever the number is, 500, 1000, 2000, 5000--and then put a sticker for the day in your monthly your calendar each time you reach that wordcount. If you get double the wordcount, you get two stickers, etc. etc.
Stickers can be motivating.
I still use it to get a visual overview of my productivity over time, but I'm more excited about an app that I discovered recently, via Alison Atlee.
The Word Tracker App (though for some reason if you search for it in the iTunes app store, it's called Writing Journal) is everything I've ever wanted in a word count app. It works by timing your writing sessions. You click the timer on when you start writing, click the timer off when you finish, and then input the number of words that you wrote in the interim (Scrivener's project target function tracks this.)
Over time, you get a running tally of how long your sessions are, how your word count per hour varies, at what hours you're most productive and least productive... it's just great.
In Conclusion
Wait, wait, before I finish I need to sneak something in here: the first book in my No Better Angels series, THE SECRET HEART, is free for the next two weeks. So if you think you might ever, at any point in time in the future, feel like reading THE SECRET HEART, go pick it up at Amazon or the iBookstore or Kobo or Barnes & Noble.
So. In conclusion. Those are all my little tools and accessories. Now I get to go check out all the other posts in the blog hop.
Today's Posts: